Category Archives: Animal Welfare

Producers respond to Food, Inc.

I posted a while ago about the opening of Food, Inc, a documentary attacking the agriculture industry. There have been two great responses to the movie on the Farm Bureau blog.

In the first post, Chris Chinn states ” This movie is an assault on food production and agriculture. No matter the size of your farm or ranch, if you are a modern farmer, using science-based production methods, the messages of this movie are an affront to you staying in business. As a farmer, agriculture is my life calling, and I have dedicated my life to producing safe, nutritious and affordable food. Our farm operation revolves around my family, and we manage every aspect of our farm in a socially responsible manner so we can pass it down to our children. Animal agriculture is the backbone of my rural community and many other rural communities across this country. I understand that contemporary agriculture doesn’t look like it did in the past. But agriculture is like many other industries that have had to become more efficient to survive.” You can learn more about Chris and her family’s hog farm by watching her YouTube video below.

In the other post, Glenn Brunkow says Food, Inc is “a sensationalized, full-on attack of the farmers and ranchers who utilized modern technology to produce the most wholesome, abundant supply of food in the world. If you a member of the agriculture community I am asking you to share our story with your non-ag friends and associates. Education is the key to stemming this tide mis-informed, anti-ag messages.”

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Advocacy, American Farm Bureau, Animal Welfare, New Media

WSB-TV exposes HSUS

Last month WSB-TV did a segment exposing HSUS and how they extract money from people who think they are donating to local humane shelters but rarely contribute to these shelters. The video was taken off YouTube but is now available again through Vidoosh. Click here to see the video. I’d encourage you to forward this link on to your contacts.

1 Comment

Filed under Animal Rights Activism, Animal Welfare, HSUS, YouTube

Recommendations for the Care and Handling of Beef Cattle

Below are the Recommendations for the Care and Handling of Beef Cattle adopted by NCBA’s Beef Quality Assurance Advisory Board and Cattle Health & Well-being Committee. These are great guidelines to not just follow but also share with people who may have questions about how livestock producers take care of their animals.

Producer Code of Cattle Care
Beef cattle producers take pride in their responsibility to provide proper care to cattle on their farms and ranches. The following are general recommendations for producers to consider in raising and handling cattle:

* Provide adequate food, water and care to protect the health and well-being of animals.
* Provide disease prevention practices to protect herd health, including access to veterinary care.
* Provide facilities that allow safe, humane, and efficient movement and/or restraint of livestock.
* Use humane methods to euthanize sick or injured livestock and dispose of them properly.
* Provide personnel with training to properly handle and care for cattle.
* Make timely observations of livestock to ensure basic needs are being met.
* Provide transportation that avoids undue stress caused by overcrowding, excess time in transit, or improper handling during loading and unloading.
* Keep updated on advancements and changes in the industry to make decisions based on sound production practices and consideration to animal well-being.
* Persons who willfully mistreat animals will not be tolerated.

Introduction
Cattlemen have long recognized the need to properly care for their livestock. Sound animal husbandry practices – based on research and decades of practical experience – are known to impact the well-being of cattle, individual animal health and herd productivity.

Cattle are produced using a variety of management systems, in very diverse environmental and geographic locations in the United States. As such, there is not one specific set of production practices that can be recommended for all cattle producers to implement. Personal experience, training, and professional judgement are key factors in providing proper animal care.

Feeding and Nutrition
Cattle should have access to an adequate quantity and quality of nutrients (feed, water, minerals and vitamins).

The nutrient requirements of cattle vary according to age, sex, weight, body condition, stage of production and environmental temperature. The National Research Council has developed guidelines describing these requirements. Nutritionists are an excellent resource and can provide specific information on the nutrient needs of cattle, nutrient availability in feed ingredients, and suggest diets based on regional differences in nutrient values of available feedstuffs.

Adequate feed quantity and quality is required for body maintenance and growth. However, cattle adapt to periodic over or under availability of feedstuffs.

Cattle should have access to an adequate supply of clean water. Although water requirements vary greatly, as a rule of thumb, water consumption will range from 1 gal per 100 lb. of body weight during cold weather, to nearly 2 gal per 100 lb. of body weight during hot weather.

Livestock Facilities
Facilities (fences, chutes, etc.) should be maintained in good working condition to provide efficient movement and reduce stress when working cattle. Sharp objects and protrusions can result in bruise damage and should be avoided whenever possible.

Equipment to restrain cattle is generally needed on most beef cattle operations. This equipment should allow for quick and secure restraint in order to minimize stress or injury to the animal or the operator. The equipment should allow for the quick release of the animal upon completion of the procedure. Experienced and trained personnel should operate restraining equipment.

Shelter
Beef cattle are produced in a variety of production settings, from pasture and range, to dry lot and confinement facilities. Moreover, cattle are adaptable to a wide range of natural conditions and artificial environments. When behavioral and physiological characteristics or cattle are matched to local conditions, beef cattle thrive in virtually any environment in the U.S. without artificial shelter. However, during extreme weather conditions, cattle should have access to well-drained resting areas and/or to natural or constructed shelter.

Animal Health Practices
Producers should implement herd health programs that address the prevention and treatment of disease. These programs will vary depending upon the type of operation and diseases prevalence in a particular region of the U.S. Cattle producers are encouraged to consult with their veterinarian to establish effective herd health programs.

Cattle should be observed regularly, particularly during critical periods of the year such as calving season, or weather related events.

Procedures such as vaccination, castration, dehorning and branding are often performed by producers. Proper techniques and equipment should be utilized. Only experienced or properly trained personnel should perform these procedures.

Beef cattle producers are encouraged to follow state or national Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) guidelines. National BQA guidelines can be obtained from the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.

Handling Sick, Disabled or Deceased Livestock
It is the responsibility of cattlemen to humanely care for their animals and make every effort to obtain veterinary care for animals that are sick or injured. Livestock that are sick or injured and non-responsive to medical treatment for a reasonable period of convalescence should be humanely euthanized on the farm or ranch. Moreover, cattle exhibiting symptoms of advanced disease (such as cattle that are severely emaciated), cattle that are non-ambulatory, or cattle with advanced stages of ocular neoplasia should not be transported to market facilities. Cattle that are disabled or become injured during transportation should be euthanized or humanely transported to a processing facility.

Euthanasia is defined as a humane death occurring without pain and suffering. It is inevitable that cattle will become sick or injured to the degree that euthanasia will be required. Sick or injured cattle that will not respond to treatment should be euthanized. Techniques for euthanasia should follow guidelines established by the American Veterinary Medical Association and the American Association of Bovine Practitioners. Detailed information on proper euthanasia techniques is available in the guide titled “Practical Euthanasia of Cattle” or producers may consult with their veterinarian concerning appropriate techniques.

Producers should use proper methods of disposing of deceased livestock in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. If utilizing a rendering service, keep deceased livestock in a screened area away from public view.

Transportation
The movement of cattle to and from farms, ranches, feedlots and marketing facilities is an important aspect of beef cattle production. Proper handling and transportation are important for the safety and welfare of the animals being moved. When loading and unloading cattle, personnel should move cattle as quietly and patiently as possible to prevent stress or injury.

Cattle should be separated by size or gender prior to shipping, and if possible, different groups loaded into separate compartments of the truck or trailer. To prevent livestock from falling while in transit, the ride should be a smooth as possible. Drivers should avoid sudden starts/stops and sharp turns. Moreover, the floors of trucks and trailers should be clean and slip resistant. While in transit, occasional stops should be made to ensure that cattle are well dispersed and still standing. Severe weather conditions must be considered when transporting livestock. As appropriate, adequate ventilation and protection should be provided during transit.

Further information on transporting cattle may be found in the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service publication, Cattle and Swine Trucking Guide for Exporters published May 1997.

Training & Education
All individuals working with livestock should be provided a sound working knowledge of proper care and handling techniques. Cattle producers should observe their employees to ensure that they are properly trained. Never assume that anyone can properly handle cattle, nor that they will always utilize proper techniques. Ongoing education should be a part of any management plan.

Education materials on basic livestock handling techniques, including the proper handling of disabled cattle are available from the Livestock Conservation Institute (LCI). Those materials include the following:

* Cattle Handling and Transportation (video)
* Livestock Handling Guide (pamphlet)
* Livestock Trucking Guide (pamphlet)
* Proper Handling Techniques for Non-Ambulatory Animals (pamphlet)
* Practical Euthanasia of Cattle (guide book)

Employees working with cattle should understand the concept of working from an animal’s flight zone. The size of the flight zone is determined by the previous experience of the animal and its temperament.

When working with cattle, individuals should avoid sudden movement, loud noises, or other actions that may frighten animals. Handling devices should be used humanely. This includes the use of persuasion devices such as canes, prods, sorting sticks and paddles.

Summary
The beef industry is often challenged to maintain a proactive position on issues of concern to individuals or special interest groups with little or no knowledge of animal agriculture. Years of practical experience have shaped the practices that provide humane care of livestock. Cattlemen are encouraged to view these guidelines as broad recommendations for the care and handling of cattle. Cattle producers wanting more specific information about proper care and handling of livestock should contact the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.

1 Comment

Filed under Animal Welfare, NCBA

My Favorite Article

I recently went through all of my published works to update my curriculum vitae (which can be seen at cgoodcomm.com). I’m proud of all of my writing but one article in particular stuck out for me. While interning at the American Farm Bureau Federation last summer I had the opportunity to write an editorial column on the topic of my choice. I think that editorial titled “Farmer and Ranchers Care About Animal Welfare” sticks with me because it gets to the root of why I’ve chosen the career path I have. I believe that American farmers and ranchers care greatly about their livestock and should be able to continue caring for livestock without unnecessary regulation. Here’s a preview of that editorial:

Farmers and ranchers might not consider themselves animal welfare activists, but no one cares more about the treatment of animals. Who else gets up in the middle of the night to check if any new calves were born? Who else wakes up at daybreak every morning, 365 days a year, to feed their livestock before enjoying their own breakfast?

The dedication and animal husbandry that has always been associated with agriculture is outstanding. Ranchers care about their livestock not just because it’s the right thing to do, but also because it’s their way of life. Healthy animals are the most productive, so it makes economic sense for producers to hold their animals’ wellbeing as a top priority. But, there’s a lot more to it than that. While agriculture is a business, livestock producers don’t pick their career path to get rich quick. They also love the rural lifestyle, the land and the animals. Click here to continue reading.

Leave a comment

Filed under Advocacy, American Farm Bureau, Animal Welfare

Rush gets Rushed

Rush Limbaugh is getting rushed with emails and phone calls about his recent affiliation with the HSUS. Agriculture groups are busy calling and emailing Rush to let him know what the HSUS is really all about. This action alert from the Animal Agriculture Alliance lists ways to contact Rush over this issue. This morning I commented on a National Institute of Canine Experts (NICE) bog post, which provides information about Rush’s sponsors and suggests contacting them as well. A couple minutes later, I got a call from NICE’s Ami Moore sharing their concerns with the HSUS and commitment to making sure Rush hears from our side of this issue.

It’s important to get involved because HSUS is also busy encouraging its supporters to contact and thank Rush. So far I’ve hear Rush is unwilling to talk about the issue on air.
images

2 Comments

Filed under Animal Welfare, HSUS, Take Action

Two Perspectives on Animal Welfare

This Feedstuffs Foodlink article offers two opposing perspectives about animal welfare.

Bernard Rollin presents what he views as misunderstandings in the agriculture industry about animal welfare. Rollin is a distinguished professor at Colorado State University in Ft. Collins. He brokered the agreement between Colorado agriculture and the Humane Society of the United States that prevented a Proposition 2-type referendum in Colorado. He has also served on the Pew Commission and convinced Smithfield to eliminate sow stalls.

Steve Kopperund explains why he thinks underestimating farmers and ranchers is a serious mistake. Kopperud is executive vice president at Policy Directions Inc., coordinator of the Farm Animal Welfare Coalition and founder and past president of the Animal Agriculture Alliance. He is based in Washington, D.C.

Leave a comment

Filed under Animal Welfare

Animal Rights groups courting Miley and Rush

HSUS and PETA are courting some new high profile celebrities these days. Rush Limbaugh has recorded two audio spots for the HSUS and PETA has awarded Miley Cyrus a Compassionate Citizenship award.
I’d encourage you to write letters to celebs when you hear about them getting in with the wrong crowd. I’m hoping someone can get through calling in on Rush’s show to talk to him about the HSUS and what they’re really up to.

2 Comments

Filed under Animal Rights Activism, Animal Welfare, HSUS, PETA